Few individuals would intentionally fly into smoke plumes produced by wildfires. Yet, atmospheric experts at the Brookhaven National Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy repeatedly trace flight patterns that might make regular plane passengers sick. Their intent? Analyze the characteristics of the soot particles generated by wildfires to determine how these plumes impact the climate of the Planet.

According to the scientists, it is crucial to accurately quantify the impact of these particles since the severity and frequency of wildfires are increasing, in part owing to droughts caused by rising global temperatures and shifting hydrologic cycles.

Arthur Sedlacek, one of the courageous smoke samplers, stated, “We need a better knowledge of the particles generated by these fires, particularly how they develop, so we can enhance our forecasts of their effects on climate, climate change, and human health.”

The publication of a research by Sedlacek and colleagues from Brookhaven and partner universities in the journal Environmental Science & Technology reveals that global climate models may not capture the complete picture.

Based on the optical characteristics of soot particles collected in the immediate region of a fire, these models assess how fires affect the climate. According to the new data, this method fails to account for soot particle variations over time. These variations, according to the scientists, may have a significant impact on how much sunlight the particles scatter or absorb, how they interact with water, and how likely they are to form clouds, all of which are crucial to how they eventually impact the climate of the Planet.

“Based on these results, we should reconsider the reliance of near-source observations and laboratory tests as the sole resource for understanding how these particles are distributed on a regional and global scale,” said Sedlacek.

Cross-sectional smoke plumes


To collect fresh data on the evolution of soot particles, scientists placed sophisticated instrumentation designed to investigate aerosol particles on DOE and NASA-operated aircraft.

With two aircraft-based atmospheric scientific programmes organised throughout the world by these two organisations, more than sixty research flights were conducted over wildfire plumes at varying distances from the flames. By repeatedly crisscrossing each plume, scientists were able to collect both immature particles near to the flames and particles that had matured over several hours. Other planes tested plumes that were far from their origins and believed to be older than 10 days.

Its major target was black carbon, often known as soot, the predominant light-absorbing material released by fires and the dominating climate-warming particle.

“Black carbon is an excellent tracer for studying wildfire plumes because it is chemically inert,” said co-author Ernie Lewis, a scientist at Brookhaven. “Since it quickly absorbs light (which is why it appears black), our sensors can easily detect it.”

The DOE aircraft used for some sampling flights, a schematic of the flight route, and a view from the plane’s window (plane picture courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility; other images courtesy of Art Sedlacek). The credit goes to the Brookhaven National Laboratory
“Furthermore, its sole avenues of removal from the environment are gravity, which has limited influence on these particles due to their small size, and precipitation once they form cloud droplets,” he explained.

In order for cloud droplets to form around black carbon, it must first be coated with other compounds. And this is where the basic black carbon tale becomes significantly more complicated.

During one hour after its formation, a black carbon particle begins to acquire an organic covering. This layer is composed primarily of volatile organic chemicals evaporated from burning plants, which encase the black carbon “cores.”

The majority of climate models assume that all soot particles resemble these evenly coated, carbon-black cores. Yet, the results gathered for this investigation indicate that the coating material’s thickness remains rather stable for just one to two days. The degree of coating then proceeds to gradually decrease until, on day 10 of the particle’s lifespan, barely 30 percent of it remains.

This gradual loss of covering material is not accounted for in current climate models, according to Sedlacek.

The statistics indicate that the particles spend a higher proportion of their lives with thinner coatings, and are closer to the ultimate, 30 percent-coated stage of development than during any other phase of their lifespan, which can last several weeks.

Light absorption and scattering


These modifications have substantial effects on the optical characteristics of the particles. When the thickness of a coating on a black carbon particle diminishes, for instance, the quantity of light dispersed by the particle drops faster than the amount of light absorbed. As light scattering by particles has a net cooling impact on the Earth’s temperature and light absorption has a net warming effect, this shift in the balance modifies the influence of these particles on climate.

This graph depicts the thickness of organic coatings on soot particles (y axis) as a function of distance from a fire (x axis). Close to the fire, thick coatings form rapidly, but these coatings lessen as particles travel away/age. The majority of a soot particle’s lifetime is spent with a thinner covering than current climate models anticipate. The credit goes to the Brookhaven National Laboratory
Moreover, for plumes at low elevations where clouds develop, particles with a thicker covering produce cloud droplets more readily. This indicates that these particles can be removed from the plume and exit the atmosphere if the cloud drop transforms into rain. Hence, the remaining black carbon particles in the plume have thinner coats.

Lewis noted, “Thinner coatings make these residual plume particles significantly more light-absorbing and less scattering than the mixture of particles in the plume before clouds formed.” Again, increased absorption may trap more heat and warm the temperature of the Planet.

Instruments of the trade


Single Particle Soot Photometer is the primary device for characterization of black carbon particles (SP2). This gadget delivers a stream of particles through a laser beam one at a time and detects light flashes when the particles evaporate. It is capable of gathering information about thousands of particles per second, including their sizes and coating thicknesses. Here is how it operates:

If a particle does not contain black carbon, it will merely scatter laser light, and the amount of scattered light may be used to measure the particle’s size.

Black carbon-containing particles are not as straightforward. They scatter some light, but they also absorb light (this is what causes the black carbon portion of the particles to be black). In doing so, they swiftly heat up, setting off a chain of events that occur in a fraction of a second.

Initially, the coatings evaporate, resulting in smaller particles that scatter less light. Having lost their coats and being unable to disperse heat, the black carbon particles quickly reach temperatures of about 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit. This causes them to evaporate and produce a burst of light. The quantity of black carbon in a particle is exactly proportional to the amount of light captured by the SP2. Subtracting this quantity from the particle size established by the first laser scattering yields the coating’s thickness.

This plethora of information on the black carbon particles and other particles in the plume can then be utilised to determine how the plume as a whole interacts with sunlight and influences climate. And by measuring plumes at different ages, scientists can gain a better grasp of how these interactions vary during the plumes’ lifespan.

These field operations provide new research issues, such as how the particles in the smoke plume produce cloud droplets, as a result of the observations made.

“Understanding the complex and intricate interactions between aerosols and clouds requires a multifaceted approach in which field measurements inform models, models identify discrepancies necessitating targeted laboratory experiments, and results from laboratory studies inspire new field campaigns,” said Sedlacek.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *